Affordable Remote CART? Web CAPTEL?

I was recently checking into prices for Remote CART for myself, so I can use it during a couple large meetings per week. I was astonished when I saw the price quotes come in at around $100/hour.

I have previously used Sprint Web CAPTEL for meetings that I can dial into via phone, but I found that participation in these meetings is nearly impossible. The captions get so far behind what is being said that if someone asks me something, I cannot see the captioned question until long after. This seems due to the nature of conference calls, versus one-on-one conversations where there is typically time to catch up (while I would be talking).

Not sure if I randomly chose remote CART companies that are pricey, or if that's really how pricey it is. Does anyone have any other suggestions for live meetings and conference calls?

Comments

Anonymous said…
I use this one: www.nextalk.net - I use it for conference calls with voice carry over. You could also check out www.nextalk.com. But I use www.nextalk.net.
April 9, 2011 at 8:53 AM
Warner said…
I am deaf I work with American Network. I want to tell you that American Network has provide PhoneCaption is very fantastic features than other company. You can visit website www.phonecaption.com is Free.
I believe that it is great for u use one.
Thank you
April 9, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Anonymous said…
CART is expensive but effective if you like receiving your messages verbatim. However, if you need faster translation, I suggest VRI (video remote interpreting). And if you don't sign but read lips, ask for an 'oral interpreter' - (interpreter repeats dialogue but in a way that is crystal clear to the lipreader) www.deafaccess.com is the vendor I use for VRI and remote CART. Both are also accessible from the i-Phone. Good luck.
April 14, 2011 at 9:09 AM
* said…
video remote interpreting sounds like the best option...best of luck!
p.s. i live in south nj and am Deaf and your blog is awesome!
April 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM
Krafyn said…
Another option is remote CAN, which provides meaning-for-meaning captioning. It is not verbatim, but it is often very close. I have provided this service for years over the Internet and am now using Skype with great success. And my rates are much less than $100 an hour!
August 20, 2011 at 6:57 PM
JoeBob said…
I use educaption.net for remote cart at work. They caption meetings for me at least once or twice a week. The cost is very close to $100 per hour but I find the assistance so invaluable and my company pays for it. Is it an option for your company to pay for it rather than yourself?
September 22, 2011 at 1:50 PM
Hanh Doan said…
I am a remote CART provider and am willing to negotiate rate. Contact me if you're interested!

hdoan83@hotmail.com
October 23, 2011 at 9:27 PM
Unknown said…
Nice information in your blog if anyone is looking for a Best remote video interpreting services then visit us at http://video-interpreter.com
August 8, 2014 at 3:58 AM
Unknown said…
That is my very first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments in your articles, I suppose I am not alone having all the leisure here! Keep up the wonderful work.Spanish Translator Milwaukee
April 6, 2018 at 11:28 AM
Unknown said…
You made this type of fascinating piece to peruse, giving each subject illumination for all of us to pick up learning. A debt of gratitude is in order for imparting the such data to us to peruse thisSpanish interpreter milwaukee
May 9, 2018 at 6:41 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New hearing aids - Rexton Cobalt 16

I picked up my new hearing aids today and thought I would post my initial thoughts. First, let's take a little journey back in time to understand some of my history. I got my first set of ears 10 years ago. They were the Senso+ model in the CIC (completely-in-the-canal) size, made by Widex. They were almost invisible and functioned fairly well, but after four years they were no longer powerful enough to keep up with my progressive loss, so I got a new set. The new set were Phonak Claro ITE (in-the-ear) models, and were far more technologically advanced, and also far larger and more noticeable. I was able to control the volume and choose programs using my Phonak wristwatch. I have worn these for about five years now, but again my hearing loss has outgrown the volume possible with these models. Fast forward to present day. I recently bought a pair of Rexton Cobalt 16 (same as Siemens Pure 700) and a bluetooth remote control that Rexton calls an RCU (same as the Siemens Tek). The...
Read more

ASL class starts today - Level TWO!!

I am really excited about taking the level 2 class this year. We were all really worried that it wasn't going to happen since we needed a minimum number of people and a couple people from level 1 moved away over the summer. So it is very welcome news that the class is happening, and I am really looking forward to taking my ASL to the next level!!
Read more

New Marvel Processors by Advanced Bionics - Review

 It has been about 7 years since I received my first cochlear implant.  I chose Advanced Bionics in 2014 and received their Q70 processor at activation.  This was their first processor based on Phonak technology, since both companies are owned by Sonova. The Q70 was a very good processor, and coupled with their HiRes Fidelity 120 programming strategy, I enjoyed good appreciation of music.  I use the Optima-P strategy in particular.  The processor was much smaller than the previous Harmony processor, and featured a much smaller, if fragile, t-mic2.  The t-mic is arguably the best feature offered by AB.  It is a microphone that hangs by a wire, and is positioned near the ear canal, allowing me to use headphones and mobile phones normally, by positioning the speaker where everyone else would hold it, instead of having to hold the speakers up near the top of the ear, where traditional mics are placed. With the Q70, I was able to use Bluetooth devices, but ...
Read more